NOW:53051:USA01012
http://widgets.journalinteractive.com/cache/JIResponseCacher.ashx?duration=5&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdata.wp.myweather.net%2FeWxII%2F%3Fdata%3D*USA01012
66°
H 66° L 41°
Clear | 10MPH
  • Print

Germantown School Board candidates eager to help

Advocate for students, better communication

Jan. 31, 2012 | 43 comments

Germantown - When Kim Fischer announced she'd be stepping down from the Germantown School Board when her term was up, there was no shortage of people willing to step up and serve the community.

Three women submitted their candidacy to join a School Board flush with new powers and responsibilities under Act 10, while struggling with budget deficits and state-imposed revenue limits.

Christina Wolf-Lang and Sarah Larson submitted paperwork to run for Seat 1 by the Jan. 3 deadline and Lisa Laskowski filed during an extension window after Fischer filed noncandidacy papers.

A primary will be held Feb. 21 to cut this from a trio to a duo.

Sarah Larson

Germantown born-and-raised, Larson attended County Line Elementary, Kennedy Middle School and Washington High School. Now, as the Director of Operations for a corporate relocation company, Larson has regularly made her opinion known to the board and often attends board meetings to offer her input.

Larson says she's noticed some breakdowns in the way board matters are conducted and she'd like to be an agent for change.

"When I sit back and watch the meeting procedurally, I think it seems as though things move at a very slow pace," Larson said. "There are some decisions that should be made a little bit quicker than they are."

Larson pointed to the most recent controversial topic of long-term care, which she said could have been handled more efficiently had the administration and board planned ahead.

"I also think having better discourse among the board members (would help). I think you can see there is some tension among the board members."

"Really, they don't have to agree but I think they should maintain decorum."

Larson, a parent with children in the district, said her main focus as a board member would be on finding ways to maintain educational standards through the instructors.

"How do we attract and retain the best talent in light of the tools Governor Walker has proposed? I know there is quite a bit of turmoil with the teachers not knowing what we we're going to go," Larson said.

"Everyone is interested in giving to the community. I have no doubt about that, so I think in the spirit of how things are so charged in terms of the current issues on the table that we all keep in mind that we're trying to act in the best interest of the children and the community."

Lisa Laskowski

Laskowski is from southeastern Wisconsin and has lived all over the country. She currently resides in Colgate where she runs a small business in clinical research.

She has two children, one at Amy Belle and one starting kindergarten next fall.

The single mother says she wants to increase her volunteer work in the community even further.

"Not only do I have a vision for the future, but I have taken action in the community on a daily basis by volunteering, fundraising for the school, (as a) Brownie troop leader," Laskowski explained.

"Our community has been highly regarded as being among the best in the state, and my goal, as a board member, is to uphold the educational standards in our community for quality education."

Having run her own business for nearly a decade, Laskowski hopes to bring her planning and financial skills to the board, which faces capped revenues.

"Running a small business, my business has been successful even through hard economic times, through hard planning both budget-wise and strategically," she said.

"We've been able to prosper. I'd like to apply those same principals serving as a board member."

Laskowski says her top priority is to be a voice for students, advocating for their needs and the needs of future generations.

Christina Wolf-Lang

With four children either in Germantown Schools or having gone through them, Christina Wolf-Lang says she's running for school board to protect her children and their peers.

"My kids are scared. My kids are concerned that the programs that they enjoy are going to be cut," Wolf-Lang said. "With all of the budget shortages and the changes that need to be made, I want to be sure that our kids are protected, that the curriculum doesn't change, that we continue to offer as many extracurricular (programs) as possible.

"I think we need to work together, and I think the current board doesn't necessarily work together."

Wolf-Lang says she sees a disconnect, at times, between the board and the school staff.

"Kids are the most important part of it to me. We're in the school district because of the schools, and I want to give students every opportunity to grow, and we have to have happy teachers in order to teach our kids constructively. There needs to be a balance.

"I think it's important for the School Board to work with the teachers. They're the ones who understand what happens on a day-to-day basis. They probably have good suggestions on what could be cut or modified."

Wolf-Lang says she sees personal agendas play too large a role in board policy.

"I don't know if there's a line when being a conservative meant you don't care for education. I think it's important to continue focusing on the kids, instead of punishing teachers," she explained.

"I have conservative values, but I believe in common sense and working together. I want to be able to bridge the gap between both political sides."

Editor's note: Election letters for the primary are due by 5 p.m. Feb. 3. Letters are limited to 300 words and can be emailed to snord@cninow.com.

Public Forum

This week's letters can be found on page 19.

Welcome to our new commenting system.
  • You can now reply to comments. Replies will be threaded to make conversations easier to follow.
  • You can continue to sort comments according to oldest first, newest first, and most thumbs up.
  • Your comments are archived on your own page.
  • Please notify us if you see personal insults or other irresponsible comments. We reserve the right to eliminate any comments and block any commenter who is not civil and respectful of others.

Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use

Limit of 2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining

Sort by
Comment threads per page: 10 | 20 | 50
  1. Thanks to Gov. Walker, the Germantown school board now has the tools to continue providing students an excellent educational opportunity, while at the same time cutting the costs of education to the taxpayer. Policies such as overpaying millons of dollars annually to healthcare providers, paying 95% of a participating employee's health premium, and paying educators and staff who don't need the district's healthcare an additional $4000 to $6000 annually, add significant cost to education, but simply do nothing to enhance a child's education. In fact,these policies steal monetary resources from programs that actually benefit students. Now is the time to use these tools, and judging from her participation and comments at school board meetings, Sarah Larson is the person school district residents can count on to use them to benefit both the student and taxpayer.
    Hide replies
    • Dear GT Reader,
      I respect your opinion, however, as a professional educator and parent of two school age children, I couldn't disagree more!

      Thanks to Governor Walker's "tools," the Germantown school district now faces a serious buddget shortfall -- and some painful choices. Axing staff positions, cutting program offerings and reducing benefits is, in my opinion, a short-sighrted way to bridge a fiscal gap,

      Radical ideas, like those endorsed by Ms. Larson, negatively impact the district's ability to recruit and retain the best and brightest teachers, and place at risk the tradition of educational excellence this community has worked so hard to achieve.

      In my view, Ms. Larson is something of a political loose cannon -- a fact that seems to be borne out by her outlandish statements at recent school board meetings. The Germantown district cannot afford to gamble on any candidate whose fiscal approach centers on making an excellent district less than it presently is.

      I believe Lisa Laskowski is a significantly better choice. She will bring a moderate voice, a much-needed sense of balance, and demonstrated budgetary skills to the board. Unlike Ms, Larson, who appears to take he marching orders from Rep. Dan Knodl, Laskowski can be counted on to leave partisan politics at the board room door and tend to the business at hand -- the business of insuring the community's educational future.
    • Dear KHB -
      Please share with us the details on how Act 10 has created this "serious buddget shortfall" that you speak of. And exactly which of Ms. Larson's endorsed ideas are the "radical ones"? Also, what exactly were her "outlandish statements"? Your statements are vague... do you have facts to support any of your comments or are these simply your opinions???
  2. "Really, they don't have to agree but I think they should maintain decorum."-- I find the quote confusing given that just prior to that Sarah Larson is negative of the current board and administration.
  3. In the spirit of a balanced debate... Lisa Laskowski actively participated in Recall Walker. If people are going to accuse Sarah Larson of taking "marching orders from Rep. Dan Knodl" perhaps we should pontificate on who Ms. Laskowski is taking her marching orders from.
    Hide replies
    • She is also the preferred candidate of the Germantown Teacher's Union. They desperately want her, but have decided not to endorse her as they know there is probably no better way to torpedo her candicacy.
    • MathMax-I have been in industry for more than 25 years. My companies were always much more successful when management had a good working relationship with the employees. Cooperation and high morale always gave superior performance vs confrontation and discord. Having a school board which vilifies the classroom teachers, (as does Larson from her public comments to the board) can only yield inferior results.
    • timothyarcher are you suggesting that people perform better at their jobs when they feel happy and respected by their boss? What a noble concept! Happy teachers=better education
    • Yes, I am. Employees that are not vilified by their employers have a better attitude about their workplace and job. They have much better performance. Is that an alien concept to you?
    • It is not alien to me. However it would seem that it might to alien to those that would like to axe even more of the teachers benefits.
    • Ms. Laskowski also distributed Roberta Darling recall petitions. (pages 305 and 306)
    • As far as I can tell, neither Scott Walker nor Alberta Darling are not on the ballot for the Germantown School Board race. The school board members do not create the state-wide rules, however their job is to play the cards that they are dealt by the state and to minimize the damage to the district. Besides, since when does participating in First Amendment-protected activities rule-out holding office?
    • Who is vilifying the teachers? Provide one statement that demonstrates one fifth of the disdain all of the Ms. Laskowski supporters have hurled at Mrs. Larson. I am all for First Amendment Rights, put not at the cost of someone else's pursuit of happiness. I have read school board meetings minutes and viewed the videos and have never seen nor heard her make a disparaging word about a teacher.

      As to the question of why the Senator Darling and Governor Walker recalls would impact a school board race in the small village of Germantown. This village and the surrounding area voted 70 percent for Governor Walker. To sign and/or circulate one of the petitions to recall the sitting Governor in a largely conservative republican area and not expect it to affect your ability to get elected its not being very perceptive. Current School Board members and current candidates may have to defend their decisions to sign or not sign the petitions prior to voters going to the ballot box this year and in years to come. You are correct, it is a First Amendment Right to sign the petition, but I do not have to vote for you if you do.

      I have not seen a bad word said by any Mrs. Larson supporters about any of the other candidates. I urge supporters of all candidates to stop the name calling and talk facts.
    • There are many implications from Larson supporters concerning other candidates. For example, in your own note at the top of this page, you imply that there is something sinister in the use of the term Ms., as well as the shape of an opponent's campaign sign. Other posters imply something untoward and evil at being supported by the teachers.
      At every school board meeting, Sarah Larson's constant refrain is that teachers are spoiled and overcompensated and that things would be great if we just continued to erode their benefits. On 11/14/11, she even suggested that teachers should have to get a job at Walmart to make it through their retirement years. If that is not vilifying, I am not sure what is.
    • I have spoken with many Larson supporters and have never heard anything negative regarding the other candidates. I just viewed the video from the 11/14/11 school board meeting and saying that Mrs. Larson is suggesting retired teachers should work at Walmart is taking her comments out of context and manipulating them to support your argument. If people want to form their own opinions I urge them to view the videos themselves and formulate their own opinions. Larson will bring a new perspective to the school board and I support a candidate that actually has ideas and a direction.
  4. Rich Anderson Write In!!!!


    The campaign starts now
  5. Why is it that when someone wants to be responsible and only spend the funds that are available they are a "loose cannon" or have "outlandish" ideas. When I spend more money than I earn, I become in debt. When cities, counties, states, and nations do this, we have our children paying our bills. Are we really looking out for our children?

    Mrs. Larson's (I believe she is married, not a single parent and not requiring the Mizz) "radical ideas" involve living within our means. If you get laid off, you do not go buy a new car on loans. When we have lean times, we spend on what is needed and make plans when the harvest is better. We are in lean times now-yes, it is looking better, but we are not out aof the woods yet. It is not time to buy a new car.

    Yes, we need to retain and recruit the best teachers possible for our kids so Germantown maintains the highest standards of education. But no, we should not give every teacher a raise because they have accrued another year of employment. Govenor Walker has provided tools to reward each teacher as an individual rather than as a group.

    The teachers of Wisconsin have had a stranglehold on the taxpayers for years. Even now, with collective bargaining gone, WEA Trust, is still dictating policy on health and disability insurance. Instead of paying into their own retirement and healthcare, the teachers union chose instead to eat their young - letting younger, newer, and cheaper teachers take the hit and loose their jobs. More than likely, this is who Ms. Laskowski is beholding to. The apple shaped sign should be a dead give away.

    I am sure that Ms. Laskowski would.be a capable school board member, but we have enough members on the board who will rubber stamp what ever the adminstation and teachers want. Let's elect a person who will do look out for the taxpayers.
    Hide replies
    • I looked at Sarah Larson's webpage. In one line she says that she wants to maintain a competitive benefit package. In another section that talks about her plans, she wants to take an ax to pretty much every part of the educator's benefit package. Despite large increases in the amount paid for medical insurance and retirement this year (as well as elimination of long-term care insurance) , she wants to institute further hikes in the % payment for medical insurance, have higher deductibles, larger co-pays, and greater out-of-pocket maxima. She also will greatly decrease life insurance to $10K and eliminate sick days. This sounds pretty radical to me. We are competing for the best teachers with districts like Shorewood and Nicolet, districts that were not so putative with their staff. I do not want to see a drain of our best teachers to surrounding districts.
    • I don't think we are in direct competition with Shorewood and Nicolet for staff. those two districts are in another county and have far bigger tax bases. As far as getting competent staff, when there are job postings in GT for teachers or staff, there are many, many applicants and finding a good person to hire is not a problem. We are competitive considering our positions and what the applicants are looking for. A lot of applicants are looking for smaller districts that are not having the chaos of MPS or other urban districts.
  6. Please get your facts straight before publishing in a public forum. Ms. Laskowski is not the preferred candidate of any teachers' union. The unions have opted not to endorse anyone until after the primary election.

    I know the competition would love to villianize Lazkowski as a union stooge and chsracterze her as a "rubber stamp," but I'd love to know on what evidence you base that assertion. In truth, you have none.

    Lisa Laskowski is bright, articulate, and level-headed. She has a clear plan to preserve the quality of education in ths community and will work hard to insure the best interests of students teachers and district taxpayers. Iwould much rather support her than a loose cannon who rencently declared in a public meeting that struggling teachers should quit complaining and take an extra job at Wal-Mart.

    Let's stick to the facts, and to the salient issues in this campaign. Ms. Laskowski's marital status, use of the honorific Ms., or her views on Gov. Walker have no bearing on a non-partisan race.


    Le's stick ti the salient issues
    Hide replies
    • The reference to marital status was to point out to everyone that Mrs. Larson was married, not a Miss. The was nothing derogatory meant although that is what many Ms. Laskowski supporters seem to perceive as based on these writings. The statements made as to union stooge may have been a "leap".but no more a leap than the Ms. Laskowski supporters stating that Mrs. Larson is a "loose cannon, radical, and has outlandish ideas". The answers provided by Ms. Laskowski for the Germantown voters forum, she states that she does not want to reduce budget shortfalls on the backs of the teachers. No where in her answers does she regard the taxpayers who would elect her and pay her salary with any importance. This would leave me to believe that she does not care about the taxpayers with the same weight as the teachers she has expressed so much concern. Not such a big leap anymore to state the she is pro teacher. Also, when is Lisa Laskowski going attend some school board meetings.

      As for Sarah Larson's comment on "getting a job at Walmart" it was directed toward retirees looking to offset costs of disability insurance rather than being directed at current teachers. Very few if any private sector employees have such lavish benefits when they leave employment.

      I have stated before, I will state again. Ms. Laskowski would be a capable school board member. I will bet all of the Laskowski supporters could not say a good word about Sarah Larson on this website or to anyone else. No, you have label people with ideas different than yours. So much for tolerance the more open minded people say they have.

      Why hide the fact that Ms. Laskowski circulated and signed the recall Senator Alberta Darling petitions. If she or her supporters signed the recall Govenor Walker petitions, so what. Just be truthful and own it so we don't choose the wrong candidate.
    • Ok, to clarify, Lisa Laskowski is the preferred candidate of some the teachers who are involved in the leadership of the GEA. This comes from first hand knowledge on hearing them talk. I never said the GEA is endorsing anyone, in fact, I said the opposite. I said they were politically smart enough not to endorse.
      To say that someone's stance on the recalls is irrevelant is intellectually dishonest for either side. The recalls are a direct result of Act 10 and that is still at the forefront of local public policy. A candidate's stance on this act is a very good barometer to see if that person's governing philosophy is in line with a voter's. This is true for either side.
    • Who endorses a candidate is not very relevant. For example, I would not hold it against Ms. Larson that the far-right extremist anti-public education MacIver foundation gave her a de facto endorsement when the board was replacing Dr. Erdman.
  7. Uhhh... GTReader, you should kniw that your state senator us ALBERTA Darling. I'm alarmed that someonr who purports to br so wrll informed would think het bame is ROBERTA. Jeesh!
    Hide replies
  8. The school district recently sent out a survey to the community regarding our school district. I would like to challenge the candidates to fill out the survey and post it online! Then, I could make an educated decision to vote for the candidte that shares my viewpoints.
  9. Inviting all Germantown Residents to attend a School Board Forum at the Germantown Community Library on Wednesday, March 14th at 6:30 PM. All School Board candidates have been invited to attend. If you wish to submit a question for the forum, contact gtownplanksx3@yahoo.com. Purpose of forum is to provide information for Germantown residents to make a better informed decision on April 3, 2012. No signs will be allowed and a Police Officer will be in attendance to maintain decorum.
  10. Dear RichfieldMom-- If you had been following the issues central to the Germantown Schood Board election, you would know that general state aid to the district was $1,245,727 LESS in fiscal year 2011-12 than they were in fiscal year 2010-11. So, in answer to your question, no, I am not spouting my personal opinions. These facts are part of the public record and can be obtained from the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction website.

    So much for governor Walker's "tools."but The only tool he has provided school districts is an axe, which they must now use to cut staff and programs in light of reduced state aid.
Suburban News Roundup

E-mail Newsletter

Your link to the biggest stories in the suburbs delivered Thursday mornings.


Enter your e-mail address above and click "Sign Up Now!" to begin receiving your e-mail newsletter
Get the Newsletter!

Login or Register to manage all your newsletter preferences.

advertisement

Local Crime Map

CONNECT    

advertisement

Latest Photo Galleries